On 27 Aug 2002 11:26:41 -0700, ladayla <ladayla_member@newsguy.com> wrote:

>In article <3d6a6491@news2.lightlink.com>, "Fluffygirl" says...
>>
>>
>>"Penult" <penult@riverstyx.com> wrote in message
>>news:vfjjmukl7dcpt1mbhql6ekafnthpoekoak@4ax.com...
>>> On 25 Aug 2002 21:52:00 -0700, ladayla <ladayla_member@newsguy.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >In article <3d697376@news2.lightlink.com>, "Fluffygirl" says...
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>"Christopher Wood" <cwood@NOSPAMxenu.ca> wrote in message
>>> >>news:pan.2002.08.26.00.05.47.395426.27428@NOSPAMxenu.ca...
>>> >>> On Sun, 25 Aug 2002 14:42:17 -0400, Fluffygirl wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> (SNIP)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> >> pages with regard to LRH's fettish with abortions marked.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > He wrote quite a few things later qualifying that. So you see, Ida,
>>> >>anyone
>>> >>> > can change.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Isn't that nice?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Publication and page number references, please?
>>> >>
>>> >>Oh, that would be everything he wrote on Dianetics after 1951 or so.
>>> >>Standard Dianetics. New Era Dianetics.
>>> >>
>>> >>The publications and page numbers are legion.
>>> >
>>> >No. They are not legion. They are non-existant. You are totally full of
>>> >arrogant, ignorant crap. You call yourself a scientologist, yet statement
>>after
>>> >statement from you shows that you don't even know what the fuck it is.
>>> >
>>> >la
>>>
>>> You weren't supposed to notice that and spoil her little world.
>>
>>What little world is that and how could anybody on this ng spoil it for me?
>>I only know a few of you in the flesh, as it were, and those who regard me
>>with disdain are just people who are only evidenced, "in my world" as you
>>call it, by electronic posts.
>>
>>> I'm still wondering about that mission to Seattle to uncover all those
>>> friends she has dinner with and force them to disconnect. Sounds like
>>> the entire Seattle Org is suppressive...
>>
>>What mission might that be?And what makes anyone think all my Scn friends
>>are from one geographical location?
>>
>>And what crawled up your ass?
>>
>>This is quite a switch from your other comments to/about me.
>>
>>But it's good to have the cards on the table.
>>
>>I'm also glad you quoted Jana's post as she's in my killfile.She sometimes
>>writes some damn good stuff and I hated having to do it, but the spite level
>>was just too high for me.
>
>My 'stuff' is always good. You are the only person on this NG that I have
>contempt for. You play the " I am a scientologist" card too much. I don't
>dislike you because you are a scientologist. I don't think that anyone else here
>does, either. Except you, of course. Were you to concede the fact that your
>attitude is a big problem, maybe you could post here without all the arguements
>that proceed from your innumerable posts. I have audited hundreds of PCs like
>you whose attitude was undesirable. Another thing"ie" is that I know that you
>lied about your alleged declare. YOU leaked the info about it, I posted it, you
>called me several names like Hypocrit, bigot, liar, don't have the data, etc.,
>then about a week later, came in here and said that you had been declared; but
>that you didn't know it when I posted the story to the NG.The fact is, I got the
>info from one whom you had told about it. So, I know you to be a liar. We have
>no proof that you ever were declared, as it turns out. Now, I personally knew
>more than 100 scn'ists in LA who lied about their affiliation with cos in order
>to accomplish a program involving infiltration of a 'splinter group' there. It
>was not unlike what you do here. A clever ploy to infiltrate a NG and cause
>argument, dissension, disagreement, and WRONG information about the tech.You
>have extremely shallow knowledge of scn, showing that your exposure to training
>and auditing is rudimentary. Which is ok. You don't seem to think it is ok,
>because you have repeatedly declined to tell us your case or training level. You
>have made statements about the Purif, and other pieces of tech that just have to
>be deliberately misleading. That stuff about having friends who didn't have the
>OT3 incident comes to mind.This shows a not-understanding of the level, and
>shows that you have not accomplished the OT levels. It's ok that you haven't
>done them. You don't have to hold onto the "this is my 2nd lifetime in scn" to
>explain why you think you know so much of it.You have cited that '2nd time
>around' three times that I read, and maybe more times that I missed. Don't you
>think that if people here were going to dis you for your beliefs, that they
>would have taken that up with you? You collapse frequently into the valence of a
>schoolteacher and tell others how and what they should post. What they should
>think. What they DO think. You would greatly benefit from a GreenForm to run out
>your compulsion with religion. Catholic schools are wonderful for their
>scholastics, but they do sock one in to the R6 bank.
>>
>>It was nice to know she still keeps on keepin' on.
>
>I will keep on keeping on. I love this NG. I loved it much more before you came
>along with your arrogant, humorless, uninformed opinions about everything and
>everyone who posts here. You bring up others in the Freezone with whom you
>'position' yourself, yet don't seem to see that they don't get the flaming that
>you do. Why do you think that is? You say " I am the noisiest scn" here, and
>while that is true (for real) you are also arrogant beyond belief, rude in the
>extreme, and woefully ignorant of that which you claim to be one of. Your
>endless Blather about black and white thinking, stereotyping, failure to
>differentiate, etc etc etc is grossly insulting to most of the people who play
>here. The wrong indications you propagate here are mostly what lead to the
>disagreements with you. But...you like that, don't you? Gets your stats up,
>doesn't it?
>end of rant (for today)
>It's good that I am in your killfile. You can never get your BS past me.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>Hubbard did qualify the statement about AAs either in Standard Dianetics or
>>in NED. Any professional (or even amateur) auditor knows that. He didn't say
>>there weren't any. See my answer to Jeff Jacobsen.
>
>What is that "Standard Dianetics"? Are you talking about HSDC? I have that pack
>right here. I have 3 sets of NED packs right here.
>>
>>I will have someone with access to Scn books (I didn't bring any out with me
>>to where I'm staying and working) dig it up sometime if I feel like it.
>
>>
>>For those who ask nicely.
>
>Well, there ya go. Cop out. Again. Standard Claire.
>>
>>It's interesting to me that this disagreement with yours truly has to be
>>displayed through expressions of spite and anger instead of just saying
>>"Well, as far as I know, that's not the case and I disagree because..."
>>
>>I also am not sure what my social life has to do with an allegation I made
>>about Dianetics.
>>
>>Why don't you try this: Take some deep breaths and say "It's only a
>>newsgroup" "Fluffygirl is only another contributor. I can ignore her if I
>>choose."
>>
>>Thanks for revealing what you really think about me. I'll take the other
>>comments you made before as prevarications and outright lies.
>>
>>C
>>
>>
>